Closing Time for California Employers Who Short Workers’ Wages at the End of Shifts

Closing Time for California Employers Who Short Workers’ Wages at the End of Shifts

27 Jul 2018

On July 26, 2018, the California Supreme Court ruled that Starbucks cannot rely on the de minimis doctrine to combat its ex-employee’s claims for unpaid wages when closing the coffee shop at the end of the day.  The ruling is a significant win for hourly workers as it ensures that Golden State employers cannot duck liability when failing to pay workers’ wages for only a few minutes of work per shift.

Specifically, in Troester v. Starbucks, California’s highest State court held that the de minimis doctrine, which excuses the nonpayment of small amounts of wages to workers and often is applied in wage cases under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), does not apply when an employer requires an employee to work off-the-clock for several minutes per shift under California wage-and-hour laws.  Indeed, Starbucks had a practice where it required employees to clock out prior to undertaking approximately 4 to 10 minutes of tasks to close the store, including turning off the computer system, locking the doors and ensuring that other employees completed all outstanding tasks.  The court found that the “relevant statutes and wage order [in California] do not allow employers to require employees to routinely work for minutes off-the-clock without compensation.”

As highlighted in the Starbucks ruling, “[w]hat Starbucks calls ‘de minimis’ is not de minimis at all to many ordinary people who work for hourly wages.”  Workers should recognize that, in addition to state labor laws, the FLSA also provides that employers must compensate workers for all identifiable time worked.  Notably, employers may round their workers’ time in instances where an employer utilizes time clocks, but it is imperative that the employer’s rounding system does not unfairly limit the time worked by employees.  Workers should review their time records and paystubs to ensure that their employers are properly compensating them for all hours worked and not using a time clock system that captures time worked in a manner that always rounds against the worker.

Share this post on
About Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP focuses on complex civil litigation, including securities, antitrust, wage and hour and consumer class actions as well as shareholder derivative and merger and transactional litigation. The firm is headquartered in New York, and maintains offices in Atlanta, Los Angeles and Philadelphia.

Since its founding in 1995, Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP has served as lead or co-lead counsel in numerous high-profile cases which ultimately provided significant recoveries to investors, direct purchasers, consumers and employees.

To schedule a free consultation with our attorneys and to learn more about your legal rights, call our offices today at (877) 247-4292 or (212) 983-9330.

Tags: California, case, employee rights, employment law, faruqi & faruqi, faruqi blog, faruqi law, FLSA, investigation, litigation, News, Patrick Collopy, settlement notice

Our Offices

Our offices are nationwide. If you have any questions about a case or our firm, please contact us.
Send Us a Message
New York
685 Third Avenue 26th Floor
New York New York 10017
(877) 247-4292 / (212) 983-9330
(212) 983-9331
Los Angeles
1901 Avenue of the Stars Suite 1060
Los Angeles California 90067
(424) 256-2884
(424) 256-2885
Atlanta
3565 Piedmont Road NE Building Four, Suite 380
Atlanta Georgia 30305
(404) 847-0617
(404) 506-9534
Philadelphia
1617 JFK Boulevard, Suite 1550 Philadelphia
Pennsylvania 19103
(215) 277-5770
(215) 277-5771